This is the second time US regulators have banned the initial offering of tokens from BitConnect. On January 9, it was reported that the North Carolina Department of Security had imposed a temporary ban on BitConnect, arguing that the company did not have permission to trade securities in the state.
“The temporary ban on trading activities is based on the fact that BitConnect was not registered as a securities dealer in North Carolina and yet offered investors an investment, calling it the “BitConnect Lending Program.”
“The audit also found that BitConnect was offering these investments in North Carolina without maintaining any official records,” the Security Division said in a statement.
BitConnect is ordered by authorities to take thirty days to retaliate or the temporary ban will become permanent.
Like their counterparts in North Carolina, the Texas Securities Exchange Board temporarily banned transactions in cryptocurrencies, claiming that they are “risky investments.”
According to https://www.coindesk.com
You May Also Like
Legal status of cryptocurrencies in the world: nonsense or legal innovation?
The legal leapfrog that has developed against the backdrop of futile attempts by regulatory authorities to regulate the “unregulated” cannot but attract attention. But in fact, all this excitement and hype, artificially inflated by state regulators around bitcoin and altcoins, can best be described in the words of Kozma Prutkov, “No one will embrace the immensity.”
Philippine economic breakthrough
CEZA (Cagayan Economic Zone Authority) - The Cagayan Free Economic Zone, located in the northern part of the Philippines, was not heard of by anyone until recently. If not for one BUT. Thanks to regulatory changes in February 2018, the CEZA authorities first “opened the doors of the tax haven” for mining farms, and on June 27 of this year they decided to break the mold altogether by making a resonant statement about the possibility of issuing 25 exchange crypto licenses on their territory.
